Alternative Delivery Offramp

“Taking the offramp” sounds like a detour, but in alternative delivery projects, it’s a deliberate pivot—terminating the process and shifting to competitive bidding when the road ahead looks rocky. So, how do you spot the warning signs that your project’s veering toward the exit?

  Often you can tell from the behavior of your Contractor (CM), but not always.  If the CM is not engaged in identifying risk mitigation solutions and actively participating in innovations vetting, and instead they just want to tell you how much everything is going to cost (without demonstrating much concern about your budget), then you’re probably headed for the exit.  An alternative delivery team should feel like a partnership.  If your partnership feels like a one-way street, then you probably don’t have the right dance partner.  However, we have seen CMs turn things around mid-project.  If you find yourself in this situation, the best thing you can do as the owner is to frequently define your expectations that the CM should focus their efforts on the preconstruction services (risk management, innovations development, schedule optimization…and then pricing). 

But don’t always pin it on the CM..  We worked on a project in 2022-23 that was off ramped.  This project started with a Volkswagen sized budget, but it had an offroad articulated dump truck size scope of work!  To make matters worse, the budget was established pre COVID19, and the preconstruction services were being priced in 2022.  Cost escalations and supply chain issues killed any chance of that project going all the way to GMP.  However, all’s well, that ends well.  When that Owner put the project out for competitive bidding, that contractor was permitted to bid, and they won the project.

Here's some good news.  This doesn’t happen very often.  Over the almost 200 projects that ICE Teams has worked on since 2016, only 2 of them have taken the offramp.  So, roughly 1% of projects don’t go the distance.  And here’s more good news, you’re not alone.  Although taking the offramp on an alternative delivery project is infrequent, it does happen.  You have counterparts at other DOTs, Port Authorities, Counties and Cities who have been there and done that.  You can reach out to them to find out how their experience went.  Additionally, I know several of our clients who have taken the offramp and I can connect you with them.  Finally, there is a group of alternative delivery specialists who meet quarterly to exchange information on their alternative delivery projects.  Contact me if you want information on ACM or if you need a lifeline or just want to talk offramps.

One last thing: hitting the offramp isn’t a failure of alternative delivery, it’s a feature. It’s the escape hatch in your toolbox, ensuring your project goals stay within reach, no matter the terrain. With ICE Teams in your corner, we’ll help you spot the signs, steer the course, or exit smartly—because success isn’t about avoiding the offramp, it’s about knowing when to take it.

 Clarifying Costs: Through Variance Analysis

When evaluating a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) estimate against an Independent Cost Estimator (ICE) estimate in heavy civil construction, a comparison report provides a comprehensive, side-by-side breakdown of costs—such as excavation or asphalt—offering a clear view of how each estimate aligns with the project scope. This format excels at presenting the full picture. For example, in a highway project, CMAR’s $30 million estimate ($8 million for earthwork, $2 million contingency) might sit next to ICE’s $28 million estimate ($7 million for earthwork, $0 contingency). This comparison helps confirm that both estimates cover the same work, such as utility relocations, while providing owners with a transparent tool for discussions. It is especially useful in the early stages of a project or when engaging stakeholders who require a complete cost narrative. However, the broad scope of a comparison report can obscure critical details, making it difficult to identify key differences. Additionally, if CMAR and ICE categorize costs differently—such as bundling versus itemizing sitework—direct comparisons may become unclear, requiring extra effort to align the data.

A variance report, on the other hand, focuses specifically on differences—highlighting only where CMAR’s estimate deviates from ICE’s. For instance, if CMAR estimates $8 million for earthwork while ICE estimates $7 million, the variance report would note a $1 million (+14%) difference. Similarly, it would flag CMAR’s inclusion of a $2 million contingency that ICE omits. This targeted approach is particularly effective for identifying key discrepancies, such as CMAR’s risk buffers for weather delays, making it an ideal tool for refining estimates before finalizing a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). By emphasizing significant variances, it streamlines decision-making—a crucial advantage in heavy civil projects where factors like grading volumes can be highly volatile. However, a variance report does not provide the broader context of aligned costs. For example, it may overlook areas where both estimates agree, such as a $5 million asphalt cost. As a result, it may be less intuitive for stakeholders who need a complete picture rather than just the differences.

Together, comparison and variance reports strike a balance between clarity and focus, offering a robust approach to CMAR-ICE estimate evaluation and enhancing transparency in the decision-making process.

Enhancing Wastewater Infrastructure: SNWA's CMAR Project for a Sustainable Las Vegas

To serve the growing demands of the Las Vegas Valley, the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) is proactively enhancing its wastewater handling capabilities and fortifying its infrastructure. This forward-thinking initiative reflects a commitment to sustainability and efficiency, ensuring that the community is well-equipped to manage the increasing population and environmental challenges. As part of this ambitious effort, we are thrilled to highlight this construction manager at risk (CMAR) project for SNWA, which plays a crucial role in supporting these wastewater management goals in the region.

 This expansive endeavor features approximately 30,000 linear feet of dual force main (30” & 20”) HDPE pipe installation, complemented by three strategically positioned lift stations more than 30 feet underground. In addition, the project includes over 12,000 linear feet of gravity sewer, all while navigating challenging rock conditions. The CMAR team has successfully incorporated multiple trenchless crossings to minimize disruption and enhance efficiency. Spanning about three years of dedicated construction, this project exemplifies commitment to quality and innovation in infrastructure development and is poised to elevate the wastewater management system in Las Vegas for years to come.

The CMAR alternative delivery method allowed the project team to effectively prioritize innovation while managing risk in a Risk Register. Their proactive approach has ensured seamless collaboration with multiple public entities, including the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), county authorities, NEPA compliance, Air Quality regulators and Private Landowners. By incorporating best practices, the CMAR team delivered on a complex permitting processes and environmental considerations. This exemplary teamwork underscores our dedication to delivering a sustainable and efficient project at the best price to SNWA and the public they serve.

Halston Waters, Cost Estimator

At Innovative Contracting & Engineering, we know that great projects start with great people—and Halston Waters is no exception. With 17 years of experience in commercial and residential construction, Halston brings a keen eye for detail, accuracy, and efficiency to our team.

For the past 11 years, Halston has worked as a skilled estimator, managing projects ranging from $500 to $5 million. His expertise in job costing, bid accuracy, and project oversight ensures the financial and operational success of every job he works on. Halston’s understanding of construction goes beyond numbers—his hands-on from being an equipment operator and even transporting heavy equipment gives him a practical, real-world perspective that strengthens his ability to deliver precise and realistic estimates.

Halston earned his Bachelor of Science in Health Promotion and Education from the University of Utah, with a minor in Physics and Chemistry. He uses Bluebeam, AGTEK Gradework 4D, and HCSS HeavyBid Software to optimize his estimating process.

When asked why he chose Innovative Contracting & Engineering, Halston shared that he was drawn to the company’s reputation for high-quality work, collaborative team environment, and forward-thinking approach to construction. He values the opportunity to work with a team that is passionate about innovation and efficiency, and he appreciates the company's commitment to supporting its employees and fostering growth.

Beyond his professional skills, Halston is an adventurer at heart. Whether it’s off-roading, camping, or tracking down the best local eats, he loves exploring new places and experiencing all they have to offer. (Pro tip: if you're ever looking for a good restaurant, Halston swears by Yelp!)

On the home front, he has been happily married for seven years and, in the past year, has embarked on an entirely new adventure—fatherhood. Balancing work, family, and his passion for the outdoors, Halston brings the same dedication, curiosity, and precision to every aspect of his life.

We are thrilled to have Halston as part of the ICE family and can’t wait to see the impact he makes on our team!

  • Alternative Delivery Consulting Services (PDB, CMGC, CMAR, DB, P3)

  • Alternative Delivery Processes Training

  • Independent Cost Estimating (Production-Based Cost Estimating)

  • Critical Path Scheduling Using Primavera P6

  • Constructability Reviews

  • Risk Management/Mitigation

  • Innovation in Construction Techniques

  • Negotiation

  • Change Order Reviews

We love what we do!  We have a passion for finding creative approaches to construction.  We are constantly looking for innovative construction techniques to add value to the projects we are working on.  Our team has found ways to reduce schedule and/or construction costs on every project we have worked on to date!

Innovative Contracting & Engineering (ICE) is a team comprised of former contractors and professional engineers who have a thorough understanding of market fluctuations, pricing trends, construction strategies, and innovations. Our experience working on alternative delivery projects across the United States has provided our team with a tool bag full of industry best practices. Construction cost estimating and scheduling is our primary focus. This focus is how we stay current on construction trends and price changes, and that helps us produce more accurate estimates than our competition. We have a passion for finding creative approaches to construction. We are constantly looking for innovative construction techniques to add value to the projects we are working on. Our team has found a way to reduce schedule and/or construction costs on every project we have worked on to date! ICE works closely with our clients to improve the quality of their most challenging projects.

Past Newsletters:

How AI Can Make Construction Projects Run Smoother

Innovations are NOT “Negative Risks.”

CMGC or PD-B: Choosing the Right Delivery Method

Are Blue Book Equipment Rates Appropriate for use on Alternative Delivery Projects?

Free Tools! - Innovations Tracking

Pareto’s Principle and Concept Cost Estimates

Meeting Project Risks & Challenges

Leaders Turn Vision into Infrastructure

Free Tools!

Market Volatility Update

5 Year Anniversary!

Early completion milestone bonuses in CMGC contracts

Risk Management Best Practices

Vision 2020?? Nobody saw this coming!

How can we help you? Send us your questions, comments, and request.

Email, Call, or Text: Dan Bender, 702-523-2354, danbender@iceteams.com